Journal of clinical epidemiology

• 

  Año 2005, Número 2

  • Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings

    Jeremy Grimshaw, Nigel Pitts, Anne Walker, Marie Johnston, Martin Eccles

    págs. 107-112

    

  • The OFF theory of research utilization

    Atle Fretheim, Signe Flottorp, Andrew D. Oxman

    págs. 113-116

    

  • Response to «the OFF theory of research utilization»

    Anne Walker, Jeremy Grimshaw, Martin Eccles, Nigel Pitts, Marie Johnston

    • Resumen

    págs. 117-118

    

  • It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data: a response to Eccle's criticism of the OFF theory of research utilization

    Atle Fretheim, Andrew D. Oxman, Signe Flottorp

    págs. 119-120

    

  • A review of the Apgar score indicated that contextualization was required within the contemporary perinatal and neonatal care framework in different settings

    Bhavneet Bharti, Sahul Bharti

    págs. 121-129

    

  • The generalizability of observational data to elderly patients was dependent on the research question in a systematic review

    Cary P. Gross, Harlan M. Krumholz, Pushkal P. Garg

    págs. 130-137

    

  • A cohort study found the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 demonstrated construct validity in high-risk primary care patients

    Ken Eng, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Jeffrey A. Johnson, Isabelle Côté, David Feeny, Karen Farris

    págs. 138-141

    

  • A simple imputation algorithm reduced missing data in SF-12 health surveys

    Bernard Burnand, Thomas V. Perneger

    págs. 142-149

    

  • A theoretical approach to choosing the minimum number of multiple tumors required for assessing treatment response

    Lawrence H. Schwartz, Partha P. Debroy, Alex Smith, Madhu Mazumdar

    págs. 150-153

    

  • A case study found that a regression tree outperformed multiple linear regression in predicting the relationship between impairments and Social and Productive Activities scores

    Heather Allore, Katy L.B. Araujo, Mary E. Tinetti, Peter Peduzzi, Susan Hardy

    págs. 154-161

    

  • An analysis of administrative data found that proximate clinical event ratios provided a systematic approach to identifying possible iatrogenic risk factors or complications

    William B. Baine, Sophia V. Kazakova

    págs. 162-170

    

  • Health plan administrative databases can efficiently identify serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis

    Michael J. Goodman, Richard Platt, Deborah Shatin, Susan E. Andrade, K. Arnold Chan, Stephanie D. Schech, David J. Graham, Judy A. Staffa, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Lois La Grenade

    págs. 171-174

    

  • Clinical items not helpful in differentiating viral from bacterial lower respiratory tract infections in general practice

    E.E. Stobberingh, G.J. Dinant, P.E.L.M. Rinkens, J.A. Knottnerus, P. Nelemans, R.M. Hopstaken, J.W.M. Muris

    págs. 175-183

    

  • An analysis of data from two general health surveys found that increased incidence and duration contributed to elevated prevalence of major depression in persons with chronic medical conditions

    Scott B. Patten

    págs. 184-189

    

  • An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue

    Jin-shei Lai, Richard C. Gershon, Jamie von Roenn, Rita Bode, David Cella, Daniel Shevrin, Kelly Dineen

    págs. 190-197

    

  • A national study showed that diagnoses varied by age group in nursing home residents under age 65

    Walter P. Wodchis, John N. Morris, John Drabek, Caroline Blaum, Brant E. Fries, Amna Buttar

    págs. 198-205

    

  • A cohort study showed that health insurance databases were accurate to distinguish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from asthma and classify disease severity

    Lucie Blais, Jason McKnight, Catherine Lemière, Dick Menzies, Jean Bourbeau, Adrienne Scott

    págs. 206-208

    

  • Re: Twisk and Proper: evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up

    Hendriek C. Boshuizen

    págs. 209-210

    

  • Is analysis of covariance the most appropriate way to analyse changes in randomized controlled trials?

    Jos Twisk, Karin Proper

    págs. 211-212