Journal of clinical epidemiology

• 

  Año 2006, Número 3

  • Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions

    Tracy J. Mayne, Edward Whalen, An Vu

    págs. 217-223

    

  • An unadjusted NNT was a moderately good predictor of health benefit

    Murray D. Krahn, Gary Naglie, Christopher A.K.Y. Chong, Nassi Figdor, George Tomlinson, Lisa Chodirker, Mark Uster

    págs. 224-233

    

  • Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies

    A.W.S. Rutjes, P.M.M. Bossuyt, M.M.G. Leeflang, R.J.P.M. Scholten, J.B. Reitsma

    págs. 234-240

    

  • A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature

    Glenn H. Griffin, Anne O. Carter, Thomas P. Carter

    págs. 241-245

    

  • Survival estimates of a prognostic classification depended more on year of treatment than on imputation of missing values

    Sally P. Stenning, Merel R. van Dijk, Ewout W. Steyerberg, J. Dik F. Habbema

    págs. 246-253

    

  • Simulation of the Syst-Eur randomized control trial using a primary care electronic medical record was feasible

    Richard L. Tannen, Sue M. Marcus, Mark G. Weiner

    págs. 254-264

    

  • Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery

    Martin Nuttall, Jan van der Meulen, Mark Emberton

    págs. 265-273

    

  • Specific comorbidity risk adjustment was a better predictor of 5-year acute myocardial infarction mortality than general methods

    Gilat L. Grunau, Elliot M. Goldner, Sam Sheps, Pamela A. Ratner

    págs. 274-280

    

  • Nondifferential disease misclassification may bias incidence risk ratios away from the null

    Juha Pekkanen, Jordi Sunyer i Deu, Susan Chinn

    págs. 281-289

    

  • Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function

    Karon F. Cook, Dennis L. Hart, Paul K. Crane, Cayla R. Teal, Jerome E. Mioduski

    págs. 290-298

    

  • New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided

    Nehmat Houssami, Stephen D. Walter, Les Irwig, Petra Macaskill

    págs. 299-307

    

  • A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts' judgment

    Mathieu Molimard, Bernard Bégaud, Yannick Arimone, Nicholas Moore, Annie Fourrier-Réglat, Françoise Haramburu, Ghada Miremont-Salamé

    págs. 308-314

    

  • Delayed diagnosis of females with respiratory presentation of cystic fibrosis did not segregate with poorer clinical outcome

    Jonathan McCormick, Erika J. Sims, Anil Mehta

    págs. 315-322

    

  • Reaction to: ¿Re: In response to the correspondence arising from Twisk and Proper: evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up,¿ by Siew F. Chan and others

    Hendriek C. Boshuizen

    págs. 323-324

    

  • Re: In response to the correspondence arising from Twisk and Proper: evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up

    Siew F. Chan, Les Irwig, Petra Macaskill, Stephen D. Walter

    pág. 323