Family law

• 

  Año 2019, Vol. 49, Número 4

  • Articles

    • New science, new families, old law: is the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act fit for purpose?

      James Munby

      págs. 364-368

      

    • The argument for a return to the Calderbank regime

      Kelly Gerrard, William Longrigg

      págs. 369-372

      

    • 'You need the house, love - let him keep his pension'

      Grant Lazarus

      págs. 373-379

      

    • Protecting Article 8 rights in the family courts: Re A (A Child)

      Rebekah Wilson, Mark Twomey

      págs. 380-385

      

    • A brief overview of the issue relating to the recognition of Talaq and Get in the UK

      Deborah Levy, Joanna Uzoka, Caoimhe Sykes

      págs. 386-389

      

    • Challenging a TR1 express declaration of trust: setting the record straight

      Chris Bevan, Elizabeth Darlington

      págs. 390-394

      

    • Clear blue water: care proceedings in England

      Isabelle Trowler

      págs. 395-398

      

    • Preventing deportation of a child at risk of FGM: can the Family Court injunct the Home Secretary? Part One

      Naomi Wiseman, James Holmes

      págs. 399-401

      

    • Deprivation of liberty: the question of consent

      Martha Gray

      págs. 402-406

      

    • Costs in fact-finding proceedings against the legally aided litigant

      Mark Ablett, Alice Scott

      págs. 407-410

      

  • In practice

    • Maintenance prorogation clauses

      Aisling O'Reilly

      págs. 411-413

      

    • Mental capacity and sexual relations: LC

      Mary Welstead

      págs. 414-417

      

    • Martin v Martin: the Court of Appeal speaks again on non-matrimonial property and the valuation of private companies in family proceedings

      Ricky Hepburn

      págs. 418-421