Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, ARSP

• 

  Año 2019, Vol. 105, Número 3

  • Law's persuasiveness and legal practice: A critical reconstruction of Bourdieus “juridical field”

    Andreas Kerkemeyer

    • Resumen

    págs. 301-316

    

  • Power and criticism: In the field of tension between the individual and society: the transformation of philosophical approaches from Horkheimer through Foucault and Waldenfels to Habermas

    Hans Friesen

    • Resumen

    págs. 317-339

    

  • The legal sociology of Eugen Ehrlich and constitutional law: The fact of pluralism and the role of Constitution

    Marcos Augusto Maliska

    • Resumen

    págs. 340-358

    

  • Merkl's contribution to Kelsen's theory of legal interpretation: A comparison of both theories of interpretation

    Matheus Pelegrino da Silva

    • Resumen

    págs. 359-375

    

  • Hart's Internal Point of View and the Theory of Legal Statements: A Problematic Relation

    David Kuch

    • Resumen

    págs. 376-391

    

  • Tragic Cases: No correct answer? An approach according to the Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy

    Cláudia Toledo

    • Resumen

    págs. 392-403

    

  • The Structure of Equality – How to deal with the so-called "non-discriminatory elements of rules“

    Dieter Krimphove

    • Resumen

    págs. 404-421

    

  • Karl-Otto Apels Letztbegründung der Diskursethik oder: ,,Transzendentale Reflexion und Geschichte“: In memoriam Karl-Otto Apel

    Dietrich Böhler

    págs. 422-426