Putting Limits on Judicial Creativity: AG Kokott’s Opinion in Commission v CK Telecoms
págs. 1-8
págs. 9-16
págs. 17-23
págs. 25-42
págs. 43-53
págs. 55-66
págs. 67-76
págs. 77-80
págs. 81-84
págs. 85-87
págs. 89-92
págs. 93-97
págs. 99-115
págs. 117-130
págs. 131-147
págs. 149-157
The Environmental Integration Principle in EU Law: Normative Content and Functions also in Light of New Developments, such as the European Green Deal
págs. 159-189
Taking Stock of Art. 13 TFEU in EU Agriculture: Reading Art. 13 as a Whole
págs. 191-219
Unravelling the Complexities of the Horizontal Clauses of Arts 8-13 TFEU: An Explanation of the Special Section
págs. 221-226
Belarus-sponsored Migration Movements and the Response by Lithuania, Latvia, and Poland: a Critical Appraisal
págs. 227-238
Ball in the Commission’s Court: Ensuring the Effectiveness of EU Law the Day After the Court Ruled
págs. 243-271
págs. 273-299
págs. 301-316
Introduction. The ECHR in the ECJ’s Case Law Post-Charter: A Dual Perspective
págs. 317-322
The Use of ECtHR Case Law by the CJEU: Instrumentalisation or Quest for Autonomy and Legitimacy?
págs. 323-330
págs. 331-347
Preface: Rewriting Landmark Judgments of the European Court of Justice: A New Project for European Papers and a New Way of ‘Doing EU Law’
págs. 349-352
Introduction: What Keck and Mithouard Actually Said – And Its Legacy
págs. 353-362
What Keck and Mithouard Should Have Said: Preventing Substantial Barriers to Market Access
Niklas Nachtnebel, Antoine Langrée, Fraser Rodger, Niamh Nic Shuibhne
págs. 363-372
What Keck and Mithouard Should Have Said: Same Same, but Different
págs. 373-383
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados