arrow_back Volver a la revista Gifted child quarterly
Assessing the Scholarly Reach of Terman’s Work
Total de citas: 7
Artículo citado |
---|
A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices (2018) Vol. 62 Núm. 2 Pág. 147-174 |
Intellectual Precocity : What Have We Learned Since Terman? (2021) Vol. 65 Núm. 1 Pág. 3-28 |
Myth 2: The gifted constitute 3% to 5% of the population. Moreover, giftedness equals high IQ, which is a stable measure of aptitude: Spinal tap psychometrics in gifted education (2009) Vol. 53 Núm. 4 Pág. 236-238 |
Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students (2018) Vol. 62 Núm. 1 Pág. 6-24 |
Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action (2019) Vol. 63 Núm. 4 Pág. 273-287 |
An evaluation (and vindication?) of Lewis Terman : What the father of gifted education can teach the 21st Century (2019) Vol. 63 Núm. 1 Pág. 3-21 |
Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature (2015) Vol. 59 Núm. 4 Pág. 213-235 |