Dos melioristas: ¿decisionismo metodológico o ética de las creencias?

• Autores: Carlos Ortiz de Landázuri
• Localización: Anuario filosófico, ISSN 0066-5215, Vol. 34, Nº 69, 2001, págs. 75-100
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • The fallibilism of Peirce and Popper admits a process of im-provement, without skepticism or relativism, as the radical post-modernism of some of their followers suggests. However Karl-Otto Apel across their intellectual life have shown that meliorism is very different in both authors: Popper justifies his position by a methodological decisionism, whereas Peirce justifies his approach by a transcendental pragmatic foundation, which is the only valid according to Apel.