Giovanni Ponti, Carmen Herrero Blanco, Juan D. Moreno-Ternero
We test the experimental properties of three well known solutions for bankruptcy problems, that is, the constrained equal-awards, the proportional and the constrained equal-losses rule.
To do this, we first let subjects play three games designed such that the �obvious� way to play coincides with one of these three rules. Moreover, we also let subjects play an additional game, that has the property that all (and only) strategy profiles in which players unanimously agree on the same rule constitute a strict Nash equilibrium. While in the first three games subjects� play easily converges to the unique equilibrium rule, in the last game the proportional rule overwhelmingly prevails as a coordination device.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados