Do voters affect or elect policies?: A new perspective, with evidence from the U.S. Senate

• Autores: David Albouy
• Localización: Electoral Studies: An international Journal, ISSN 0261-3794, Vol. 30, Nº. 1, 2011, págs. 162-173
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Using quasi-experimental evidence from close elections, Lee et al. (2004) – henceforth LMB – argue competition for voters in U.S. House elections does not affect policy positions, as incumbent Senate candidates do not vote more extremely if elected than non-incumbents. Despite stronger electoral competition and greater legislative independence, similar results, shown here, hold for the Senate. Yet, the hypothesis that voters do not affect policies conflicts with how Senators moderate their positions prior to their next election. LMB-style estimates appear to be biased downwards as junior members of Congress prefer to vote more extremely than senior members, independently of their electoral strength. Corrected estimates are more favorable to the hypothesis that candidates moderate their policy choices in response to electoral competition.