Establishing specialty jurisdictions in medicine: the case of American obstetrics and gynaecology

• Autores: James R. Zetka Jr.
• Localización: Sociology of Health & Illness, ISSN-e 1467-9566, Vol. 33, Nº. 6, 2011, págs. 837-852
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Keywords:medical specialisation;the medical profession;surgery;gynaecologic oncology;professions and occupations Abstract The profession of medicine has evolved into an extremely specialised occupation. Yet, recent research has neglected the intra-occupational processes influencing medical specialisation. This article aims to correct this oversight. It develops an historical account of intra-occupational factors influencing the decision to establish gynaecologic oncology as American ob/gyn�s surgical subspecialty in 1972. Working within the framework initially developed by Everett C. Hughes and his students, the article examines this development as the outcome of a three-party relationship among gynaecologic oncologists, American ob/gyns, and gynaecologic pelvic surgeons. Aggressive movement by the gynaecologic pelvic surgeons challenging the established élite�s identity definition for the ob/gyn specialty helped spur official recognition of gynaecologic oncology, a less threatening subspecialty. The article draws theoretical implications from the case regarding the role of a threatening other in influencing the specialisation process.