Resumen de Persistent Pain and Frailty: A Case for Homeostenosis

Joseph W. Shega, William Dale, Melissa Andrew, Judith A. Paice, Kenneth Rockwood, Debra K. Weiner

• Objectives: To compare the association between self-reported moderate to severe pain and frailty.

  Design: Cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Wave 2.

  Setting: Community.

  Participants: Representative sample of persons aged 65 and older in Canada.

  Measurements: Pain (exposure) was categorized as no or very mild pain versus moderate or greater pain. Frailty (outcome) was operationalized as the accumulation of 33 possible self-reported health attitudes, illnesses, and functional abilities, subsequently divided into tertiles (not frail, prefrail, and frail). Multivariable logistic regression assessed for the association between pain and frailty.

  Results: Of participants who reported moderate or greater pain (35.5%, 1,765/4,968), 16.2% were not frail, 34.1% were prefrail, and 49.8% were frail. For persons with moderate or greater pain, the odds of being prefrail rather than not frail were higher by a factor of 2.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.13�2.99; P < .001). For persons with moderate or greater pain, the odds of being frail rather than not frail were higher by a factor of 5.52 (95% CI = 4.49�6.64 P < .001).

  Conclusion: Moderate or higher pain was independently associated with frailty. Although causality cannot be ascertained in a cross-sectional analysis, interventions to improve pain management may help prevent or ameliorate frailty.