Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Why "parité" is a better goal than quotas

  • Autores: Nadia Urbinati
  • Localización: International journal of constitutional law, ISSN 1474-2640, Vol. 10, Nº. 2, 2012, págs. 465-476
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • Quotas, parité, and proportional representation have been the main strategies for redressing injustice in political representation, as well as for amending women’s under-representation. These strategies are an explicit recognition that representation is both a democratic value and a form of participation. The search for strategies of redress is undoubtedly an important fact that testifies to a change in women’s attitude toward representative politics as no longer a target of mistrust in the name of direct participation. This article advocates making parité the general criterion for justice in representation as the best rendering of the peculiarity of women in political representation.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno