Communicating to the Courts and Beyond: Why Members of Congress Participate as Amici Curiae

• Autores: Rorie L. Spill Solberg, Eric S. Heberlig
• Localización: Legislative studies quarterly, ISSN 0362-9805, Vol. 29, N. 4, 2004, págs. 591-610
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Members of Congress engage in discretionary behaviors, such as making speeches and cosponsoring bills, which are generally motivated by either electoral needs or policy preferences. We examine a discretionary behavior that engages the judicial branch in the conversation: the participation of members of Congress as amici curiae before the Supreme Court. Amicus curiae briefs provide members of Congress with a direct avenue of communication with the judiciary, and this characteristic suggests that cosigning would be a method of creating good public policy. Using data from the 1980�97 terms of the Supreme Court, however, we find that members of Congress cosign onto amicus curiae briefs as a means of �taking stances,� akin to cosponsoring a bill. The action allows the member to speak indirectly to an audience beyond these governmental institutions. Evidence shows that ideological extremism and committee jurisdiction promote participation as amicus curiae.