Purpose � The paper aims to motivate more rigorous theoretical and empirical specification of the home regionalization phenomenon, in particular the dynamics of shifting advantage over time within a multinational enterprise. It aims to improve dialogue among regionalization researchers.
Design/methodology/approach � Contrasting the economizing and behavioral perspectives on internationalization, the paper presents five different archetypes of the home-regionalization phenomenon. These archetypes are predicated on strategic management stylizations of competitive advantage.
Findings � The paper demonstrates that the notion of home regionalization as a dominant and superior model for firm internationalization remains a promising yet under-explained and inconsistently articulated thesis. By introducing and exploring the archetypes, it shows the diversity of home-regionalization theses, and the prospect that multiple forms of regionalization may be at play for different firms, industries and locations.
Originality/value � The paper presents the full complement of archetypes of the home-regionalization phenomenon and explores their corresponding assumptions. These explorations open up new empirical and theoretical research avenues for distinguishing any genuine region effects.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados