We investigate the effect of standard setters in standard setting. We examine how certain professional and political characteristics of FASB members and SEC commissioners predict the accounting �reliability� and �relevance� of proposed standards. Notably, we find FASB members with backgrounds in financial services are more likely to propose standards that decrease �reliability� and increase �relevance,� partly due to their tendency to propose fair-value methods. We find opposite results for FASB members affiliated with the Democratic Party, although only when excluding financial-services background as an independent variable. Jackknife procedures show that results are robust to omitting any individual standard setter.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados