Legislative Dissent without Reprisal?: An Alternative View of Speaker Selection

• Autores: Zachary Spicer, John L. Nater
• Localización: The Journal of legislative studies, ISSN 1357-2334, Vol. 19, Nº. 4, 2013, págs. 505-525
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Very little research has been devoted to examining the nature of Speaker selection in legislatures. This article attempts to provide a new perspective in which future research could examine the election of Speakers. A collective action perspective is put forward, which sees three groups of actors execute separate strategies to reach their own ends: the backbench, the executive and the opposition. These factors are tested on the Speaker selection exercises in the Ontario legislature. In the case study, it was found that the executive rarely gets their choice of Speaker, and three factors identified in the legislative dissent literature are utilised to examine these private acts of dissent: party popularity, cabinet size and the percentage of new legislators entering the party at each legislative term. It was found that the Speaker selection process involves three groups, each with their own preference order in decision-making.