Motivations for relativism as a solution to disagreements

• Autores: Steven D. Hales
• Localización: Philosophy, ISSN-e 1469-817X, Vol. 89, Nº. 1, 2014, págs. 63-82
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • There are five basic ways to resolve disagreements: keep arguing until capitulation, compromise, locate an ambiguity or contextual factors, accept Pyrrhonian skepticism, and adopt relativism. Relativism is perhaps the most radical and least popular solution to a disagreement, and its defenders generally think the best motivator for relativism is to be found in disputes over predicates of personal taste. I argue that taste predicates do not adequately motivate relativism over the other possible solutions, and argue that relativism looks like the most promising approach when disputants cannot even agree on the meta-evidence for a contested proposition.