The non-rivalness of scientific knowledge has traditionally underpinned its status as a public good. In contrast we model science as a contribution game in which spillovers differentially benefit contributors over non-contributors. This turns the game of science from a prisoner's dilemma into a game of �pure coordination�, and from a �public good� into a �contribution good�. It redirects attention from the �free riding� problem to the �critical mass� problem. The �contribution good� specification suggests several areas for further research in the new economics of science and provides a modified analytical framework for approaching public policy.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados