This paper suggests that there are different ways of writing the same rule, some of which will be more accessible and comprehensible to the reader than others. Elaborate �systematic� statutory law�of the type that characterizes much modern legislation�is contrasted, as to its accessibility, with case law or common law systems, partly relying upon text �readability� studies of the last eighty years. Drawing on the author�s previous analogy between rules and �fractals��shapes, like coastlines, whose borders are infinitely complicated�the article suggests that one way to balance the ultimately irreconcilable rule-writing goals of precision and reasonableness is to make more use of rule construction devices like the �safe harbor�. Under the safe-harbor (or �unsafe harbor�) approach, a vague default standard is combined with specification of the outcomes for those fact scenarios that are foreseeably most likely to arise, creating a sort of synthetic case law in advance, and potentially minimizing the number of �hard cases� that will arise.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados