Conventional wisdom holds that joint audits would improve audit quality by enhancing audit evidence precision because �Two heads are better than one.� Our paper challenges this wisdom. We show that joint audits by one big firm and one small firm may impair audit quality, because, in that situation, joint audits induce a free-riding problem between audit firms and reduce audit evidence precision. We further derive a set of empirically testable predictions comparing audit evidence precision and audit fees under joint and single audits. This paper, the first theoretical study of joint audits, contributes to a better understanding of the economic consequences of joint audits on audit quality.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados