Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Functorial comparisons of bitopology with topology and the case for redundancy of bitopology in lattice-valued mathematics

    1. [1] Youngstown State University

      Youngstown State University

      City of Youngstown, Estados Unidos

  • Localización: Applied general topology, ISSN-e 1989-4147, ISSN 1576-9402, Vol. 9, Nº. 1, 2008, págs. 77-108
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • This paper studies various functors between (lattice-valued) topology and (lattice-valued) bitopology, including the expected “doubling” functor Ed : L-Top → L-BiTop and the “cross” functor E× : L-BiTop → L2-Top introduced in this paper, both of which are extremely well-behaved strict, concrete, full embeddings. Given the greater simplicity of lattice-valued topology vis-a-vis lattice-valued bitopology and the fact that the class of L2-Top’s is strictly smaller than the class of L-Top’s encompassing fixed-basis topology, the class of E×’s makes the case that lattice-valued bitopology is categorically redundant. As a special application, traditional bitopology as represented by BiTop is (isomorphic in an extremely well-behaved way to) a strict subcategory of 4-Top, where 4 is the four element Boolean algebra; this makes the case that traditional bitopology is a special case of a much simpler fixed-basis topology.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno