Should 16-Year-Olds Be Allowed to Vote in Westminster Elections?: Public Opinion and Electoral Franchise Reform

• Sarah Birch ^[1] ; Harold D. Clarke ^[2] ; Paul Whiteley ^[3]
  1. [1] University of Glasgow

     University of Glasgow

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] University of Texas at Dallas

     University of Texas at Dallas

     Estados Unidos

     
  3. [3] University of Essex

     University of Essex

     Colchester District, Reino Unido

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Parliamentary affairs: A journal of representative politics, ISSN 0031-2290, Vol. 68, Nº 2, 2015, págs. 291-313
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Britain has a long and often celebrated history of progressively expanding the electoral franchise. In recent years, the idea has been advanced to allow 16-year-olds to vote in general elections. This article uses data from a July 2013 national survey to examine public attitudes on this topic. These data show that less than one person in six favours lowering the voting age, with a large majority preferring the status quo. Younger—but not the youngest—people, men, working class and lower income persons, self-identified members of the ethnic majority and Scots tend to be most favourably disposed towards lowering the voting age. Multivariate analyses confirm these socio-demographic relationships and demonstrate that views about reducing the voting age covary in theoretically expected ways with several attitudinal variables prominent in the literature on voting, political participation and support for democratic political systems. Although statistically significant, none of the relationships of interest is especially strong. Thus, an effort to lower the age of majority would lack widespread popularity and be only weakly leveraged by the demographics of the British electorate. If franchise change occurs, it likely will be the result of an elite-driven project that succeeds because of widespread public indifference.