Bone-Implant Contact on Machined and Dual Acid-Etched Surfaces After 2 Months of Healing in the Human Maxilla

• Autores: Dr. Paolo Trisi, Richard J. Lazzara, Alberto Rebaudi, Walter Rao, Tiziano Testori, Stephan S. Porter
• Localización: Journal of periodontology, ISSN 0022-3492, Vol. 74, Nº. 7, 2003, págs. 945-956
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Background: Recent clinical studies indicate that an implant with a textured surface may be loaded sooner than traditional healing protocols have recommended. In a previous study, the 6-month bone-implant contact for dual acid-etched and machined implant surfaces was reported to be 72.96% and 33.98%, respectively. In 1991, a minimum of 50% bone-implant contact was considered necessary for loading to ensure long-term survival of the implant. This study evaluated the 2-month bone-implant contact for dual acidetched and machined implant surfaces to determine if this criterion had been met.

    Methods: Custom manufactured implants (2 mm diameter and 5 mm length), having on one side a machined surface and on the other side a dual acid-etched surface, were placed in the posterior maxilla of 11 patients, allowed to integrate for 2 months, then removed using a 4 mm internal diameter trephine with irrigation. Sections were processed and stained for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. The parameters calculated for each section were: bone volume (BV%), actual percent bone-implant contact (BIC%), and expected bone contact (EBC%) as determined from 3 implant images superimposed onto the adjacent bone 150, 500, and 1,000 µm lateral to the actual implant surface and representing the bone-implant contact expected on the day the implant was placed, based on the peri-implant bone volume.

    Results: Histomorphometric analysis indicated that the mean BV% of 36.77% from all sections was closely matched to the mean EBC% of 34.36% (P<0.001). The analysis showed that after 2 months of healing, the 47.81% BIC% on the dual acid-etched side was statistically higher (analysis of variance, P<0.001) than the 19.00% BIC% on the machined side. In areas of low-density bone (<40% BV%), the difference between the BIC% for the machined and dual acid-etched sides was even greater. Nine of the 11 dual acid-etched sides had a higher BIC% than the EBC% value. In the machined group, 1 of the 11 sides had a higher BIC% value than the EBC% value. The bone surrounding the dual acid-etched surface was a woven bone with thin, connecting peri-implant bony trabeculae projecting into and between the threads. Bone on the machined side was observed mostly contacting the tips of the screw threads.

    Conclusions: At 2 months, the mean BIC% for the dual acid-etched group increased 39.14% compared to the EBC% value, while the mean BIC% for the machined group decreased 44.70%. Based on the histomorphometric results of this study, sufficient bone for functional loading of the implant exists on a dual acidetched surface after 2 months of healing in the posterior maxillary arch.