Casey Dougal, Joseph Engelberg, Christopher A. Parsons, Edward D. Van Wesep
This paper documents that the path of credit spreads since a firm's last loan influences the level at which it can currently borrow. If spreads have moved in the firm's favor (i.e., declined), it is charged a higher interest rate than is justified by current fundamentals, whereas if spreads have moved to the firm's detriment, it is charged a lower rate. We evaluate several possible explanations for this finding, and conclude that anchoring to past deal terms is most plausible.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados