In this work we aim to approach the deliberative model derived from the Social intuitionism�s neuro-ethical proposal of Jonathan Haidt. Firstly, we will analyze some core points of this neuro-psychological theory. Then, we will submit to review its deliberative proposal. Concretely, we�ll focus on the two illusions of moral deliberation which, according to Haidt, drive moral deliberation. Finally, we�ll analyze the lacks that this model could have. To achieve this aim it will be useful to confront Haidt�s thesis with the theories developed by the authors of deliberative democracy such as Habermas, Rawls, Gutmann and Thompson, Cortina or Bohman
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados