Averting catastrophes: the strange economics of Scylla and Charybdis

• Autores: Ian W. R. Martin, Robert S. Pindyck
• Localización: American economic review, ISSN 0002-8282, Vol. 105, Nº 10, 2015, págs. 2947-2985
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Faced with numerous potential catastrophes¿nuclear and bioterrorism, mega-viruses, climate change, and others ¿which should society attempt to avert? A policy to avert one catastrophe considered in isolation might be evaluated in cost-benefit terms. But because society faces multiple catastrophes, simple cost-benefit analysis fails: even if the benefit of averting each one exceeds the cost, we should not necessarily avert them all. We explore the policy interdependence of catastrophic events, and develop a rule for determining which catastrophes should be averted and which should not. (JEL D61, Q51, Q54)