Which Map? Which Government?: Malapportionment and Gerrymandering, UK-Style
-
Ron Johnston [1]
-
[1] University of Bristol
University of Bristol
Reino Unido
-
- Localización: Government and opposition: An international journal of comparative politics, ISSN 0017-257X, Nº. 1, 2015, págs. 1-23
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
Commentators suggest that the UK is entering a period in which general election results are unlikely to produce a clear winner. In such a situation, how and where the constituency boundaries are drawn is crucial, as different configurations of seats in particular places could have a significant impact on an election outcome. Although those configurations are recommended to Parliament by non-partisan Boundary Commissions, research has shown that Labour has been significantly advantaged by their recent proposals because they incorporated the equivalents of two well-known American electoral abuses – malapportionment and gerrymandering. This article illustrates how and why they have operated and discusses how the Conservatives’ failed attempt to remove one of them (malapportionment) and influence the other (gerrymandering) might have impacted on its position prior to the 2015 general election.
