Ambiguous reference

• Autores: Shaun Nichols, N. Ángel Pinillos, Ron Mallon
• Localización: Mind, ISSN-e 1460-2113, Vol. 125, Nº. 497, 2016, págs. 145-175
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • One of the central debates in the philosophy of language is that between defenders of the causal-historical and descriptivist theories of reference. Most philosophers involved in the debate support one or the other of the theories (or perhaps some combination of them). Building on recent experimental work in semantics, we argue that there is a sense in which both theories are correct. In particular, we defend the view that natural kind terms can sometimes take on a causal-historical reading and at other times take on a descriptivist reading. The meaning will shift depending on the conversational setting. The theoretical view has roots in work by Kitcher. We present some original experiments that support the thesis.