Non-state actors and global crime governance: : Explaining the variance of public-private interaction

• Localización: The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, ISSN-e 1467-856X, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2016, págs. 72-89
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Global crime governance has become a major area of international activity, including a growing number of public and private regulatory efforts. Yet it is puzzling that a considerable variance exists in how state and non-state actors interact: non-state actors have been important agenda-setters in some issue areas, while they have been absent in others. Sometimes they are implementation bodies, sometimes they set regulations themselves. I argue that this variance is caused by issue characteristics: If an issue area is framed in a highly moralised way, it is likely that resulting non-governmental activity can be explained by normative convictions, and in particular advocacy occurs frequently. If an issue area is framed in a technical way, resource exchange is central, and delegation to non-state actors becomes more prominent. A comparison of human trafficking, conflict diamonds, money laundering and cybercrime shows that this relation can be found on the global and national level.