Character control and historical moral responsibility

• Autores: Eric Christian Barnes
• Localización: Philosophical Studies, ISSN-e 1573-0883, Vol. 173, Nº. 9, 2016, págs. 2311-2331
• Idioma: alemán
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Some proponents of compatibilist moral responsibility have proposed an historical theory which requires that agents deploy character control in order to be morally responsible. An important type of argument for the character control condition is the manipulation argument, such as Mele’s example of Beth and Chuck. In this paper I show that Beth can be exonerated on various conditions other than her failure to execute character control—I propose a new character, Patty, who meets these conditions and is, I argue, morally responsible for her actions despite lacking character control. Thus the character control condition is unmotivated. I suggest there may be an alternative basis for an historical theory of moral responsibility nonetheless.