Handling of Polyvinylsiloxane Versus Polyether for Implant Impressions
- Autores: Daniel Farhan, Wiebke Lauer, Guido Heydecke, Ghazal Aarabi, Daniel R. Reissmann
- Localización: The International Journal of Prosthodontics, ISSN-e 1942-4426, Vol. 29, Nº. 4, 2016, págs. 403-405
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
-
Resumen
Purpose: This study compared polyvinylsiloxane with polyether in handling dental impressions.
Materials and Methods: Each participant (N = 39) made four impressions, each a combination of pickup and reseating techniques with polyether or polyvinylsiloxane, of one implant cast representing a specific clinical situation (tooth gaps, limited residual dentition, or edentulous jaw). Handling of impressions was subsequently rated by using a 12-item questionnaire with 100-mm visual analog scales.
Results: While mean satisfaction scores were higher for polyvinylsiloxane than for polyether (69.5/63.0, P < .001), differences among subgroups were statistically significant only for pickup technique, limited residual dentition, and edentulous jaw.
Conclusion: Implant impressions made with polyvinylsiloxane using a pickup technique seem to be the best option for most clinical situations.
