Resumen de Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
Christopher Anderson, Štěpán Bahník, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Frank A. Bosco
Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
