Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Comparison of two diagnostic techniques, skin-prick test and component resolved diagnosis in the follow-up of a cohort of paediatric patients with pollinosis: Multicentre pilot study in a highly exposed allergenic area

    1. [1] Hospital de Fuenlabrada

      Hospital de Fuenlabrada

      Fuenlabrada, España

    2. [2] Hospital Universitario La Paz

      Hospital Universitario La Paz

      Madrid, España

    3. [3] Hospital del Tajo

      Hospital del Tajo

      Aranjuez, España

    4. [4] Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena de Valdemoro, España
    5. [5] Hospital Infanta Cristina de Parla, España
    6. [6] ALK-Abelló, S.A. Madrid, España
  • Localización: Allergologia et immunopathologia: International journal for clinical and investigate allergology and clinical immunology, ISSN-e 1578-1267, ISSN 0301-0546, Vol. 45, Nº. 2, 2017, págs. 121-126
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • Background Over the last years, different works have been published about the importance of incorporating new diagnosis techniques in allergic patients such as component-resolved diagnosis (CRD). The objective of this study is to compare the evolution of allergic sensitisation profiles by means of CRD and cutaneous tests (SPT) on pollen-allergic patients.

      Methods A total of 123 patients aged between 2 and 14 years were included in an open, prospective, multicentre study. All the children had symptoms suggestive of seasonal respiratory allergic disease, with the diagnosis confirmed by cutaneous tests. Specific-IgE to major pollen-allergens (CRD) and SPT were performed at basal and after three years of follow-up.

      Results Out of 123 patients included, a total of 85 were analysed. The mean age was 8 ± 3 years. Significant changes in the allergic sensitisation profiles were observed for the most prevalent allergens (Olea and grass) but it is in grass, the most relevant allergen in terms of allergen pressure, where changes in both absolute and relative frequencies between SPT and CRD were more evident.

      Conclusion CRD seems to be an essential tool to carry out an appropriate follow-up of patients with allergic respiratory disease, as well as to decide on the immunotherapy composition that best matches the allergic sensitisation profile of patients.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno