In Roman law, we find the terms "voluntas or consensus" with the adjective "perseverans", and far example the expression "in eadem voluntate perseverare". In fact, there are two kinds "voluntas", a first one that could be called "initial", and a second one which implicates the durability, the time that goes on. This leads to a question: what are the consequences when someone, part of a juridical act, became "furiosus", whereas his "perseverantia voluntatis" is longer required?
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados