Juan A. Marin-Garcia, Julien Maheut, Julio J. García Sabater
We present the results of comparing various ways of calculating students' final grades from continuous assessment grades. Traditionally the weighted arithmetic mean has been used and we compare this method with other alternatives: arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean and multiplication of the percentage of overcoming of each activi-ty. Our objective is to verify, if any of the alternative methods, agree with the student’s performance proposed by the teacher of the subject, further discriminating the grade be-tween high and low learning outcomes and reducing the number of approved opportunists. [Comparación del efecto de diferentes modos de agregar las califica-ciones de evaluación continua en la nota final]
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados