Peter Heering, Sebastian Kowalski
Recently, several papers in the field of science education have been published that analyse school and university textbooks with respect to accounts of certain historical experiments, such as Millikan’s oil drop experiment or the photoelectric effect. In doing so, the authors generally criticize the accounts in today’s textbooks as erroneous with respect to the historical experiment, as well as misleading with respect to aspects of the nature of science. Even though these criticisms are well founded, it remains an open question why these accounts can be found in textbooks. It appears to be evident that not every detail of the historical experiment can be included in the description; consequently, decisions are to be made on which aspects are relevant and which are superfluous. These decisions are not simply made, but are the outcome of a historical process –consequently it appeared to be interesting to examine the genesis of these descriptions.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados