New psychometric data from the Spanish versions of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale measures

• Miren Orive ^[3] ; Ane Antón-Ladislao ^[3] ; Nerea González ^[3] ; Begoña Matellanes ^[1] ; Jesús Ángel Padierna ^[3] ; José Luis Cabriada ^[3] ; Aitor Orive ^[4] ; Víctor Manuel Orive ^[2] ; José María Quintana ^[3]
  1. [1] Universidad de Deusto

     Universidad de Deusto

     Bilbao, España

     
  2. [2] Hospital Universitario de Basurto

     Hospital Universitario de Basurto

     Bilbao, España

     
  3. [3] Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
  4. [4] Hospital Universitario de Araba

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, ISSN-e 2340-4167, ISSN 1130-0108, Vol. 110, Nº. 1, 2018, págs. 10-18
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Background and objective: There are no structural abnormalities in functional dyspepsia, therefore it is essential to have a viable questionnaire to measure treatment outcome according to patient perception. The aim of the study was to extensively document psychometric characteristics of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale that are currently available in Spanish. Methods: Patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 158) were recruited from a randomized trial that assessed standard vs. standard and psychological treatment. Participants had completed the validation questionnaires and the Medical Outcome Study Short-form 36. Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), validity (Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent and known group validity) and responsiveness (minimal clinically important difference) were analyzed. Results: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score showed a one-factor solution model, but a low Cronbach’s alpha (0.61). With regard to the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale, the Cronbach’s alpha (0.80-0.97) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a model with four inter-correlated dimensions and suggested a need to improve the “Satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health” dimension (Cronbach’s alpha < 20). Finally, the global scores for both the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score and the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale were responsive at six months post-treatment, with a minimal clinically important difference of 4 and 6, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings support the continued application of the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale and the need to improve the “Satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health” dimension. Although the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score is a promising questionnaire, further review of the content is required to eliminate and add items in order to provide greater consistency to the evaluated construct.