Five years of PCK summit, what has endured: 2. A factorial analysis of correspondence of the science PCK published papers

• Carvalho Gastaldo , Brunno ^[1] ; Castro , Pablo Micael ^[1] ; Homem de Mello , Paula ^[1] ; Sérgio Henrique Leal
  1. [1] Universidade Federal do ABC

     Universidade Federal do ABC

     Brasil

     
• Localización: Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, ISSN-e 2174-6486, ISSN 0212-4521, Nº Extra 0, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: X Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en Didácticas de las Ciencias (Sevilla, 5-8 de septiembre de 2017)), págs. 601-606
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Trying to understand teacher’s professional knowledge, Shulman has popularised the Pedagogical Content Knowledge, from then on several models were proposed. To minimise such differences the PCK Summit was held aiming to develop a single model to unify the field. However, five years has passed and none of the researchers present at the event has adopted the Consensus Model, leaving a question of its impact on them. To access it, a lexicometric analysis of the papers published before and after the Summit was performed, being presented here the factorial analysis of correspondence, which has shown that the questions of the papers published before lead to the main questions of the event, and were solved in it, changing the subject of interest of the researchers. Another important aspect is that the discourse of the researchers put in the same work group in the Summit became more similar after it, showing that the Summit exert some effect on the researchers.