Payment Source and Emergency Management of Deliberate Self-Harm.

• Autores: Steven C. Marcus, J. A. Bridge, Mark Olfson
• Localización: American journal of public health, ISSN 0090-0036, Vol. 102, Nº. 6, 2012, págs. 1145-1153
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • Objectives. We investigated whether health insurance type (private vs Medicaid) influences the delivery of acute mental health care to patients with deliberate self-harm. Methods. Using National Medicaid Analytic Extract Files (2006) and Market- Scan Research Databases (2005-2007), we analyzed claims focusing on emergency episodes of deliberate self-harm of Medicaid- (n = 8228) and privately (n = 2352) insured adults. We analyzed emergency department mental health assessments and outpatient mental health visits in the 30 days following the emergency visit for discharged patients. Results. Medicaid-insured patients were more likely to be discharged (62.7%), and among discharged patients they were less likely to receive a mental health assessment in the emergency department (47.8%) and more likely to receive follow-up outpatient mental health care (52.9%) than were privately insured patients (46.9%, 57.3%, and 41.2%, respectively). Conclusions. Acute emergency management of deliberate self-harm is less intensive for Medicaid- than for privately insured patients, although discharged Medicaid-insured patients are more likely to receive follow-up care. Programmatic reforms are needed to improve access to emergency mental health services, especially in hospitals that serve substantial numbers of Medicaid insured patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]