Engaging Key Stakeholders to Assess and Improve the Professional Preparation of MPH Health Educators.

• Autores: Laura Linnan, Allan Steckler, Suzanne Maman, Meg Ellenson, Elizabeth French, Lynn Blanchard, Mike Bowling, Nina Yamanis, Stacey Succop, Amy Davenport, Beth Moracco
• Localización: American journal of public health, ISSN 0090-0036, Vol. 100, Nº. 10, 2010, págs. 1993-1999
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Objectives. We described the process of engaging key stakeholders in a systematic review of requirements for a master of public health (MPH) degree within the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, and summarized resulting changes. Methods. A benchmarking study of 11 peer institutions was completed. Key stakeholders (i.e., current students, alumni, faculty, staff, employers, and practicum preceptors) received online or print surveys. A faculty retreat was convened to process results and reach consensus on program revisions. Results. MPH program changes included (1) improved advising and mentoring program, (2) elimination of research and practice track options, (3) increased elective and decreased required credit hours, (4) replacement of master's paper requirement with "deliverables" (written products such as reports, documents, and forms) produced as part of the required "Capstone" course, (5) extended community field experience to 2 semesters and moved it to year 2 of the program, and (6) allowed practica of either 200, 300, or 400 hours. Conclusions. Engaging key stakeholders in the program review process yielded important changes to the MPH degree program requirements. Others may consider this approach when undertaking curriculum reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]