Framing Peak Petroleum as a Public Health Problem: Audience Research and Participatory Engagement in the United States.

• Autores: Matthew C. Nisbet, Edward W Maibach, Anthony A. Leiserowitz
• Localización: American journal of public health, ISSN 0090-0036, Vol. 101, Nº. 9, 2011, págs. 1620-1626
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Between December 2009 and January 2010, we conducted a nationally representative telephone survey of US adults (n=1001; completion rate=52.9%) to explore perceptions of risks associated with peak petroleum. We asked respondents to assess the likelihood that oil prices would triple over the next 5 years and then to estimate the economic and health consequences of that event. Nearly half (48%) indicated that oil prices were likely to triple, causing harm to human health; an additional 16% said dramatic price increases were unlikely but would harm health if they did occur. A large minority (44%) said sharp increases in oil prices would be "very harmful" to health. Respondents who self-identified as very conservative and those who were strongly dismissive of climate change were the respondents most likely to perceive very harmful health consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]