Political Factors Affecting the Enactment of State-Level Clean Indoor Air Laws.

• Autores: Gregory Jackson Tung, Jon S. Vernick, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Daniel W. Webster
• Localización: American journal of public health, ISSN 0090-0036, Vol. 104, Nº. 6, 2014, págs. 92-97
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Objectives. We examined the effects of key political institutional factors on the advancement of state-level clean indoor air laws. Methods. We performed an observational study of state-level clean indoor air law enactment among all 50 US states from 1993 to 2010 by using extended Cox hazard models to assess risk of enacting a relevant law. Results. During the 18-year period from 1993 to 2010, 28 states passed a law covering workplaces, 33 states passed a law covering restaurants, 29 states passed a law covering bars, and 16 states passed a law covering gaming facilities. States with term limits had a 2.15 times greater hazard (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27, 3.65; P = .005) of enacting clean indoor air laws. The presence of state-level preemption of local clean indoor air laws was associated with a 3.26 times greater hazard (95% CI = 1.11, 9.53; P = .031) of state-level policy enactment. In the presence of preemption, increased legislative professionalism was strongly associated (hazard ratio = 3.28; 95% CI = 1.10, 9.75; P = .033) with clean indoor air law enactment. Conclusions. Political institutional factors do influence state-level clean indoor air law enactment and may be relevant to other public health policy areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]