Investigating the impact of requirements elicitation and evolution on course performance in a pre-capstone design course

• Beshoy Morkos ^[3] ; Shraddha Joshi ^[1] ; Joshua D. Summers ^[2]
  1. [1] James Madison University

     James Madison University

     Estados Unidos

     
  2. [2] Clemson University

     Clemson University

     Estados Unidos

     
  3. [3] Florida Institute of Technolgy (USA)

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Journal of Engineering Design, ISSN 0954-4828, Vol. 30, Nº. 4-5, 2019, págs. 155-179
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This paper investigates the correlation between requirements evolution and course grades in a pre-capstone design course. A case study is performed whereby requirements are collected on a common design project from eight separate design teams across the design process that culminates in a physical deliverable. This research was performed using the case study approach as it is commonly utilised to investigate occurrences in real-life context and focus on answering exploratory questions. The requirements are analysed through a three step process where requirements are interpreted with respect to the solution, classified as constraints or criteria, and classified as functional or non-functional. The evolution of requirements are correlated to the team’s course grade through statistical analysis. Evolution considers both the difference in requirements from start to finish and the week-to-week changes in requirements. The findings reveal the number of requirements students generate at the start does not impact course grades success. However, a higher number of defined requirements throughout the project, early functional requirement definition, and the continuous evolution of functional requirements were found to have a positive effect on course grades. Based on the results of the study, a set of guidelines and recommendations are developed for use within design courses.