Eroded enamel rehardening using two intraoral appliances designs in different times of salivary exposure

• Fernanda-Lyrio Mendonça ^[1] ; Maisa-Camillo Jordão ^[1] ; Poliana-Pacífico Val ^[1] ; Catarina-Ribeiro-Barros de Alencar ^[1] ; Marcela-de Azevedo-Garcia Bassoto ^[1] ; Heitor-Marques Honório ^[1] ; Ana-Carolina Magalhães ^[1] ; Marília-Afonso-Rabelo Buzalaf ^[1] ; Thiago-Cruvinel da Silva ^[1] ; Daniela Rios ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidade de São Paulo

     Universidade de São Paulo

     Brasil

     
• Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 11, Nº. 12 (November), 2019, págs. 1127-1132
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The aim of this study was evaluated the eroded enamel rehardening potential using upper palatal and lower buccal removable appliances in different times of salivary exposure (30 min, 1h, 2h, 12h) after a single erosive challenge event.

    After initial surface hardness evaluation, bovine enamel blocks were eroded in vitro (0.01 M hydrochloric acid, pH 2.3, 30 seconds), selected (n = 160) and randomly assigned to the two appliance designs and twenty volunteers. Four enamel blocks were inserted in each removable appliance. On the in situ phase, the volunteers were instructed to use the upper palatal and lower buccal appliances simultaneously for 12 nonconsecutive hours. After each predetermined period of time of salivary exposure, the enamel blocks were removed from the appliances for immediate evaluation of surface hardness, enabling percentage of surface hardness recovery calculation (%SHR). The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=5%).

    The results showed no difference in the degree of enamel rehardening by the upper palatal or lower buccal appliances (p >0.0001). Regarding the time of use of the appliances, it was demonstrated that 30 minutes (upper = 21.12%, lower = 19.84%) and 1 hour (upper = 35.69%, lower = 30.50%) promoted lower hardness recovery than two hours (upper = 44.65%, lower 40.80%) of salivary exposure (p<0.0001). The use of 12 hours (upper = 49.33%, lower = 49.00%), including the sleeping time of the volunteers did not increase the %SHR.

    The location of the appliance does not influence the re-hardening ability of saliva and the use of intraoral appliances for 2 hours seems to be appropriate for partial rehardening of the softened enamel surface.