RAE de Hong Kong (China)
As the citation frequency of a journal is a representation of how many people have read andacknowledged their works, academia generally shares the notion that impact factor and citationdata signify the quality and importance of a journal to the discipline. Although this notion is well-entrenched, is it reasonable to deduce that a journal is not of good quality due to its lower impactfactor? Do journal impact factors truly symbolize the quality of a journal? What must be notedwhen we interpret journal impact factors? This commentary article discusses these questions andtheir answers thoroughly.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados