Cpap adherence may slow 1-year cognitive decline in olderadults with mild cognitive impairment and apnea

• Autores: Kathy C. Richards, Nalaka S. Gooneratne, Barry Dicicco, Alexandra L. Hanlon, Stephen Moelter, Fannie Onen, Yanyan Wang, Amy- Sawyer, Terri Weaver, Alicia Lozano, Patricia Carter, Jerry Johnson
• Localización: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, ISSN 0002-8614, Vol. 67, Nº. 3, 2019, págs. 558-564
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Resumen

  • Background/Objectives Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been linked to an increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but little prospective evidence exists on the effects of OSA treatment in preclinical AD. The objective was to determine if continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment adherence, controlling for baseline differences, predicts cognitive and everyday function after 1 year in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to determine effect sizes for a larger trial.

    Design Quasi‐experimental pilot clinical trial with CPAP adherence defined as CPAP use 4 hours or more per night over 1 year.

    Setting Sleep and geriatric clinics and community.

    Participants Older adults, aged 55 to 89 years, with an apnea‐hypopnea index of 10 or higher participated: (1) MCI, OSA, and CPAP adherent (MCI +CPAP), n = 29; and (2) MCI, OSA, CPAP nonadherent (MCI −CPAP), n = 25.

    Intervention CPAP.

    Measurements The primary cognitive outcome was memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test‐Revised), and the secondary cognitive outcome was psychomotor/cognitive processing speed (Digit Symbol subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Substitution Test). Secondary function and progression measures were the Everyday Cognition, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study‐Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale, and Clinical Dementia Rating.

    Results Statistically significant improvements in psychomotor/cognitive processing speed in the MCI +CPAP group vs the MCI −CPAP group were observed at 1 year after adjustment for age, race, and marital status (parameter estimate = 1.68; standard error = 0.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.73‐2.62), with a 6‐month effect size (ES) of 0.46 and a 1‐year ES of 1.25. There were small to moderate ESs for memory (ES 0.20, 6 mo), attention (ES 0.25, 1 y), daytime sleepiness (ES 0.33, 6 mo and ES 0.22, 1 y), and everyday function (ES 0.50, 6 mo) favoring the MCI +CPAP group vs the MCI −CPAP group.

    Conclusion Controlling for baseline differences, 1 year of CPAP adherence in MCI +OSA significantly improved cognition, compared with a nonadherent control group, and may slow the trajectory of cognitive decline.