Alcune aporie della “necessità della contingenza”.: Una lettura critica del realismo speculativo di Quentin Meillassoux

• Autores: Francesco Panizzoli
• Localización: Acta Philosophica: rivista internazionale di filosofia, ISSN 1121-2179, Vol. 29, Nº. 2, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: 100 anni dopo Weber. Luci e ombre di fecondità), págs. 415-430
• Idioma: italiano
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Some aporias of the "necessity of contingency". A critical reading of Quentin Meillassoux's speculative realism – Meillassoux’s speculative realism is aporetic in its outcome in two ways. 1) It should lead to the abandonment of the concepts of ‘contingenty’ and ‘necessity’ because of the principle: “only contingency is necessary”. If it is a principle of being (and not of thought), than there is only the reality, the only absolute, in which ‘contingenty’ and ‘necessity’ have no meaning. 2) If there are no reasons for the existence of things, than there isn’t any “foundation”. But therefore: why the IperCaos? So the Meillassoux’s speculative realism seems not to be so “strong” and “new”, but it is like an “old” rationalism.