Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe
-
Balázsi, Ágnes [1] ; Dänhardt, Juliana [2] ; Collins, Sue [4] ; Schweiger, Oliver [3] ; Settele, Josef [4] ; Hartel, Tibor [1]
-
[1] Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
Rumanía
-
[2] Lund University
Lund University
Suecia
-
[3] Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Kreisfreie Stadt Leipzig, Alemania
-
[4] Butterfly Conservation Europe, P.O. Box 506, NL-6700 Wageningen, the Netherlands
-
- Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 100, 2021
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
- Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
-
Resumen
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The CES subcategories cover a wide range of domains (e.g. recreation, conservation of cultural heritage, human-nature relations). The CES concept has been proposed to acknowledge the nonmaterial values linking people and nature in social-ecological systems. Agricultural landscapes are outstanding examples of complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine the CES values. Europe is still rich in such landscapes/systems with outstanding cultural and natural values that deliver a multitude of CES. In this paper, we address the knowledge and perceptions of identified experts on the role of CES in the management of European agricultural landscapes. To achieve this goal, we developed a questionnaire on CES which was answered by experts working with various issues of European agricultural landscapes, including sustainable agriculture, landscape ecology, grassland management, nature conservation, cultural heritage conservation, environmental policy, sustainability research and rural development. The results show a wide knowledge and acceptance of the CES concept within such expert communities. Especially the aesthetic, cultural heritage, educational and recreational values were considered the most relevant CES subcategories. Interdisciplinary approaches, landscape planning and integrative science-policy approaches were perceived as the most promising methodologies to improve the CES approach for policy and management. Our results also show that according to experts the CES concept is still far from practical implementation in policies that target agricultural landscapes. In order to sustain such systems, we suggest the better implementation of inter- and transdisciplinary research for the development of CES-integrative policy and decision-making.
