Predictive factors for the perceptual learning in stereodeficient subjects

• Juan A. Portela-Camino ^[4] ; Santiago Martín-González ^[1] ; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer ^[2] ; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute ^[5] ; David P. Piñero ^[3] ; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad de Oviedo

     Universidad de Oviedo

     Oviedo, España

     
  2. [2] Universidad Complutense de Madrid

     Universidad Complutense de Madrid

     Madrid, España

     
  3. [3] Universitat d'Alacant

     Universitat d'Alacant

     Alicante, España

     
  4. [4] Department of Optometry, Clinic Begira, Bilbao, Spain
  5. [5] Department of Optometry, Begitek Clinic, Donostia, Spain

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Journal of Optometry: peer-reviewed Journal of the Spanish General Council of Optometry, ISSN-e 1888-4296, Vol. 14, Nº. 2, 2021, págs. 156-165
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Background Stereopsis is a valuable feature of human visual perception which is critically impaired in amblyopia, but can be improved through perceptual learning (PL). This article aims to determine the variables affecting the outcomes and intensity of a stereoacuity stimulation program.

    Methods Re-analysis of a previous study in stereodeficient subjects with a history of amblyopia. Sixteen subjects (12 females, 4 males) aged between 7 and 14 received stereopsis stimulation through a PL program at home. A correlation analysis evaluated whether treatment intensity or percentage improvement were related to age or baseline stereoacuity measurements. Further analysis was performed to assess whether the type of amblyopia conditioned the PL treatment (Fischer Statistical Test).

    Results No significant correlation was found between age and percentage improvement (rho=−0.08, p=0.749), nor was age correlated with treatment intensity (rho=0.170, p=0.544). However, a correlation did exist between baseline stereoacuity levels and treatment intensity (rho=0.734, p=0.001). Baseline stereoacuity and percentage improvement had a negative correlation (rho=−0.748, p=0.005), while treatment intensity showed only a weak association with the type of amblyopia (p=0.064).

    Conclusions Present results suggest that perceptual learning in stereodeficient subjects is not influenced by either the subject's age or the type of amblyopia. Baseline stereoacuity, on the other hand, seems to be a predicting factor for perceptual learning outcomes. According to our study, subjects with poor basal stereoacuity needed more sessions to improve and their percentage improvement was lower. However, due to the reduced size of the sample, the results should be considered with caution