Resumen de The Constancy and Development in the Christology of Theodoret of Cyrrhus by Vasilije Vranic (review)
[...]he participated in the Council of Chalcedon in 451 only as an accuser of Dioscorus, being barred from the deliberations that produced the council’s famous Definition. Only after its promulgation was Theodoret’s case heard; the condition of his restoration was anathematization of Nestorius, to which he acquiesced. [...]Chalcedon exonerated Theodoret as orthodox, an action that would trouble later generations. [...]the union of divine and human in Christ cannot take place at the level of substance or nature—as there is an infinite difference between the uncreated and created natures—but only at the level of personal existence.
